World

No one wanted Trump’s portrait, so his charity had to buy it, lawyer says

indsamachar

The attorney general alleges the foundation illegally participated in a political campaign by allowing senior campaign staff to dictate how $2.8 million raised at the event was spent, ‘all for the purpose of influencing the 2016 presidential election.’

When Donald Trump offered to pay $10,000 from his personal charitable foundation for a six-foot oil portrait of himself, the future president only meant to ‘get the bidding started’ during a 2014 auction at his Mar-a-Lago resort, his lawyer told a New York judge.

“No one else bid,” attorney Alan Futerfas said in a packed Manhattan courtroom on Thursday, so “he’s stuck with the painting”. Trump’s lawyer offered the account as one of several reasons why New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood’s lawsuit against the Donald J. Trump Foundation should be tossed out, arguing that the transactions at the center of the case have innocent explanations or were corrected by the charity.

For example, Futerfas said it was ‘troubling’ that Underwood would focus on a payment that was made to benefit a charity that aids children and young adults with developmental disabilities. He also claims the suit is politically biased, part of an effort by Democrats to undermine Trump’s presidency.

But Underwood claims in the lawsuit that the nonprofit was little more than Trump’s ‘piggy bank,’ and that legitimate donations were overshadowed by rampant violations of state charity law and the use of donated funds for business purposes. She’s seeking to dissolve the charity and to ban the president from serving on a New York not-for-profit for 10 years.

“It is beyond dispute that these were improper self-dealing transactions,’ Yael Fuchs, a lawyer for the attorney general, said at the hearing. New York State Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla ended the hearing without making a ruling, after largely shutting down Futerfas’s assertions of political bias by Underwood. ‘I don’t want to get into that,’ Scarpulla said.

Campaign finances

The case will instead hinge on Underwood’s claims about campaign finance violations and the various transactions by the Trump Foundation, including the portrait acquisition. Underwood alleges that after Trump misused charity cash to buy the painting, he gained further benefit from the work when the Trump Organization hung it on the wall of Trump’s hotel in Doral, Florida.

‘This was improper self-dealing, since foundation money was used to buy a painting to decorate a Trump business property,’ the attorney general said in a court filing. But Futerfas says the portrait only graced the hotel’s walls because staff found it sitting in a storage room and didn’t realize it belonged to the charity. Shortly after the election, amid media scrutiny, the hotel returned the painting to the charity and paid it $185.82 plus interest as a fair rental value.

Among the other violations cited was the foundation’s involvement in a January 2016 Trump Campaign fundraiser in Iowa. The attorney general alleges the foundation illegally participated in a political campaign by allowing senior campaign staff to dictate how $2.8 million raised at the event was spent, ‘all for the purpose of influencing the 2016 presidential election.’

The other transactions cited in the state’s lawsuit are:

The judge said she can’t decide the case until after an appeals court rules in a different case on whether Trump has presidential immunity from litigation in state courts. In that lawsuit, former ‘Apprentice’ contestant Summer Zervos accuses Trump of defamation for denying her allegations that he groped her.

Futerfas said the case against the Trump foundation is wrongfully focusing on a few transactions out of hundreds that involved money going to organizations in need, amounting to nearly $19 million. Every penny raised by the foundation was donated to charity, aside from $1.7 million being held up by the litigation, Futerfas said.

35 Comments

35 Comments

  1. Pingback: london taxi firms

  2. Pingback: Medium Mireille

  3. Pingback: https://www.pinterest.com/ketquaxosotv/

  4. Pingback: cash-bitcoin.com

  5. Pingback: cheap with bangs wigs

  6. Pingback: huong dan 188bet

  7. Pingback: 메이저놀이터

  8. Pingback: immediate edge reviews

  9. Pingback: immediate edge

  10. Pingback: 토토사이트

  11. Pingback: replica rolex

  12. Pingback: Harold Jahn Canada

  13. Pingback: mini sex doll

  14. Pingback: replika rolex

  15. Pingback: Digital transformation

  16. Pingback: CI CD

  17. Pingback: List of DevOps Tools

  18. Pingback: http://cheapreplicawatchesunder.com/

  19. Pingback: ilk üyelik bonusu

  20. Pingback: Market

  21. Pingback: Steroids Uk Buy

  22. Pingback: Vanessa Getty net worth

  23. Pingback: 레깅스룸

  24. Pingback: sell cc good

  25. Pingback: best dumps cc site

  26. Pingback: Study in Africa

  27. Pingback: colt firearms for sale

  28. Pingback: sbo

  29. Pingback: nova88

  30. Pingback: buy track online

  31. Pingback: 토토백화점

  32. Pingback: รวมค่ายเกมส์

  33. Pingback: ufabet365

  34. Pingback: Best DMT shop Victoria

  35. Pingback: Buy DMT online Perth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2 × 3 =

News is information about current events. News is provided through many different media: word of mouth, printing, postal systems, broadcasting, electronic communication, and also on the testimony of observers and witnesses to events. It is also used as a platform to manufacture opinion for the population.

Contact Info

Address:
D 601  Riddhi Sidhi CHSL
Unnant Nagar Road 2
Kamaraj Nagar, Goreagaon West
Mumbai 400062 .

Email Id: [email protected]

West Bengal

Eastern Regional Office
Indsamachar Digital Media
Siddha Gibson 1,
Gibson Lane, 1st floor, R. No. 114,
Kolkata – 700069.
West Bengal.

Office Address

251 B-Wing,First Floor,
Orchard Corporate Park, Royal Palms,
Arey Road, Goreagon East,
Mumbai – 400065.

Download Our Mobile App

IndSamachar Android App IndSamachar IOS App
To Top
WhatsApp WhatsApp us