All-rounder Ben Stokes has cleared the air regarding the controversial ‘six’ which was awarded to England during the World Cup final against New Zealand.
“I saw all of that. I was thinking to myself, did I say that? But hand on heart, I did not go up to the umpires and say something like that to the umpires,” he said in the latest episode of BBC podcast.
“I went straight to Tom Latham and said ‘Mate, I am so sorry’, looked over to Kane (Williamson) and said ‘I’m sorry’,” he added.
During the final over in England’s chase of 241 on July 14 at Lord’s, Stokes accidentally knocked the ball coming in from deep midwicket fielder and deflected it off to the third man boundary, while attempting to dive for his crease with an outstretched bat in a bid to complete his second run.
After consultation with Marais Erasmus and the rest of his umpiring colleagues, Kumar Dharmasena signalled six runs for the incident, meaning that England — who by then seemed to be drifting out of contention needing nine runs from three balls — were suddenly right back in the hunt for their World Cup glory needing three more from two.
England were adjudged winners of the World Cup on the basis of their superior boundary count — 22 fours and two sixes — to New Zealand’s 17 after the the match ended in a tie after regulation play and Super Over.
Earlier, Stokes’ teammate James Anderson had claimed that the all-rounder, who was hugely apologetic the moment the incident happened, had appealed to the umpires to overturn their decision.
“I think, talking to Michael Vaughan who saw him after the game, Ben Stokes actually went to the umpires and said, ‘Can you take that four runs off. We don’t want it’,” Anderson had told BBC’s Tailenders podcast.
Dharmasena, who was targeted for his controversial overthrow call, had accepted his mistake, but said he didn’t regret the decision. ICC had also backed the Sri Lankan umpire over the issue.
Former India skipper Anil Kumble-led Cricket Committee will also be discussing issues relating to the World Cup final, including the controversial boundary count back rule, in their next meeting in first quarter of 2020.

Pingback: sbobet
Pingback: press release distribution of press release
Pingback: prediksi togel
Pingback: wong4d
Pingback: kalpa pharma testosterone cypionate
Pingback: เงินกู้ สุรินทร์
Pingback: satta king
Pingback: 토토사이트
Pingback: eq 300 dragon pharma
Pingback: cypionate 250 dragon pharma
Pingback: tanoto foundation beasiswa 2021
Pingback: wig with bangs
Pingback: prediksi hk
Pingback: high quality pubic wig with 50 discount
Pingback: diamond painting kits
Pingback: Regression testing
Pingback: sell car
Pingback: AOC E2350SDA manuals
Pingback: 킹스포커
Pingback: กล่องอาหาร
Pingback: Glo Carts
Pingback: beretta guns for sale
Pingback: move to good dumps shop
Pingback: maxbet
Pingback: เอสบีโอ
Pingback: 토토달팽이
Pingback: 토토밀라노
Pingback: cvv dumps shop
Pingback: Alexa Nikolas lawsuit
Pingback: her latest blog
Pingback: you can try these out
Pingback: window repair
Pingback: ufa
Pingback: 카드단말기
Pingback: penis prosthetic big penis big prosthetic big dildo erect penis prosthetic